![]() The Stanford user study involved 47 people with varying levels of experience, including undergraduate students, graduate students, and industry professionals. ChatGPT has mastered the confidence trick, and that's a terrible look for AI.GitHub adds admin controls to Copilot, paints 'Business' on the side, doubles price.Those low-code tools devs love so much? They'll grow 20% in 2023, says Gartner.Stack Overflow bans ChatGPT as 'substantially harmful' for coding issues.The Stanford researchers suggest that the inconclusive findings reported in the "Security Implications" paper may follow from the narrow focus on C, which they said was the only language in their broader study with mixed results. They observe, however, that their work differs because it focuses on OpenAI's codex-davinci-002 model rather than OpenAI’s less powerful codex-cushman-001 model, both of which play a role in GitHub Copilot, itself a fine-tuned descendant of a GPT-3 language model.Īlso, the Stanford study looks at multiple programming languages (Python, Javascript, and C) while the "Security Implications…" paper focuses just on functions in the C programming language. The Stanford scholars also cite a followup study from some of the same NYU eggheads, " Security Implications of Large Language Model Code Assistants: A User Study," as the only comparable user study they're aware of. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |